Jennifer, my lovely daughter, had a wonderful orthodontist. He was the dental equivalent of Mr. Rogers. Gentle. Caring. The kids loved him. The parents respected him. We, the parents, just hated going to his office.
Jen and her fellow patients were all in middle school. They would check in and find their way back to an open room and an array of colored rubber bands. The parents would sit and wait, hoping to not be noticed by the doctor’s office manager, a young woman who had a habit of standing in the doorway and calling out to us.
“Mr. Cunix.” Uh oh. “Doctor says that Jenny should do a better job brushing her teeth.”
“Mrs. Smith.” It was someone else’s turn. “Your insurance wasn’t approved.”
I began waiting for Jen in the building’s atrium. I was not alone.
Great dentist. Happy kid. All was right in the world right up till my insurance got screwed up. I had to go in. Ms. Noisy was sure that I had a problem. I quickly determined what she had done wrong. Now she was both loud and unhappy. It was time to meet with the doctor.
With childlike innocence, the orthodontist explained to me that he only dealt with the teeth. He didn’t know anything about the paperwork. He didn’t touch it. I looked him in the eye and reminded him that he owned a business. He couldn’t divorce himself from the hard part. He couldn’t keep his hands clean.
The paperwork got better and the consultations with the parents became private.
I was reminded of this long ago confrontation by Dr. Johnathan Ross’s rant in this past Sunday’s Plain Dealer. Dr. Ross is identified as the past president of Physicians for a National Health Plan and a leader of Single Payer Action Network in Ohio. I have provided the links. Take a moment to read the article and research the groups.
Dr. Ross is positive that our health care delivery system’s only problem is our method of payment. It’s the insurance companies. If only we had a single payer system. Our costs would plummet and all would be right in the world.
“So what’s the alternative? It’s building on the solid foundation of our tax-financed, low-overhead Medicare system, and extending it to cover everyone without exception. The administrative savings from such a streamlined system would amount to $400 billion per year, enough to provide comprehensive coverage to all with no significant out-of-pocket expenses and with complete choice of doctor and hospital.
A single-payer system would also have the clout to negotiate drug prices and provider fees, and to allocate resources efficiently and wisely. It would possess powerful tools for improving quality and controlling costs.”
At the risk of sounding like a Saturday Night Live Skit, REALLY?
We would save $400 billion a year?
Really?
Comprehensive coverage to all with no significant out of pocket expenses?
Really?
Clout to negotiate drug prices and provider fees?
Really?
Allocate resources efficiently and wisely?
ENOUGH!
Somehow our federal government would suddenly repair its abysmal record of fraud prevention, negotiate drug prices and provider fees, and reorganize our entire health care delivery system with no increase in administration costs or personnel. G-d knows, when I think efficiency, I think Washington.
Is this all a lot of hooey? Not quite. Dr. Ross is hoping that we, like my daughter’s orthodontist, will forget that medicine is a business. Big business. Dr. Ross, and physicians like him, are offended that the insurance industry is part of their business. A large part. I don’t take it personally. Sometimes I’m offended that the doctors are a part of mine.
Dr. Ross wants to be paid better, faster, and with less paperwork and oversight. Can we take the risk out of being a business owner? Can we just guarantee him a steady, predictable income free of hassle and concern? Give him that and he promises to check the blood pressure and pulse of little old ladies for years to come.
It doesn’t work that way, at least not yet. Administrative costs are probably higher than they need to be. But we should also check out the building costs for the new doctors’ offices and hospital palaces popping up all over Greater Cleveland. All those TV commercials for the newest drugs cost lots and lots of money. The system is also fueled, in part, with unnecessary tests and expensive, futile procedures.
Attack all or attack none.
DAVE
Somewhere between the idea that the insurance companies are the best stewards of the health care system and the assertion that the role is best played by the government lies the real truth. Regardless of who is running the ship, we need more transparency and some mechanism for forcing adjustments to prevent waste, greed and denial of service where it makes sense.
Transparency is the answer. But who is going to enforce it?
Well, Dave, I tried three times to post here under different profiles and it didn't look like anything took. If things are just going slowly, you'll have tons o comments from moi.
There may be a problem posting comments at this time.
leaving things to the government to take care of…oh, sure, they'll fix everything, like the oil spill.
exonerating the insurance companies? ha.
yes, there has to be more transparency.
yes, we need to find a better way.
yes, yes yes. lots of questions, no viable answers. the republicans blame the democrats who blame the republicans. why can't we all play fairly and nicely?